Thursday, February 19, 2015

The Democrats, unions and even some RINOs, are once again tampering with the selection process for candidates to fill recent Carrol County Republican vacancies in the Maryland General Assembly.  We are requesting the public's help in outing any of those unqualified, disingenuous and/or otherwise unfit candidates for possible appointment by the current governor.  Feel free to comment, anonymously or otherwise, regarding those shill candidates and related issues on this thread.

The Maryland Constitution clearly stipulates that the Party Central Committees of Maryland are to submit just one name for such vacancies.  So, we are stepping up to help our fellow real Republicans in Carroll County vett the current crop of 26 candidates as listed in poll elsewhere on this web page.  Thanks, in advance, for you genuine concern and support!

Wednesday, April 10, 2013

Questions for MDGOP Chairman candidates regarding Republican NATIONAL Committee policy issues

The following are questions for MDGOP Chairman candidates regarding Republican NATIONAL Committee (RNC) policy issues which the Chairman would or should take a national policy position on as one of our representatives at the NATIONAL level.

1.  Why would you - or not - strongly oppose any efforts which facilitate the legalization of same-sex marriage at the national level?

2.  Why would you - or not - support any "gun control" compromises which infringe upon the individual right to keep and bear arms, even in the most annoyingly minor ways?

3.  Why would you - or not - support the thorough investigation and prosecution of violations of our constitutional rights and civil liberties committed under both the Bush/Cheney and current Obama/Biden administrations?

Augustus Alzona 2013-04-10

Tuesday, March 5, 2013

Full 3 minute text version of testimony submitted to the MD House Judiciary Committee by Augustus Alzona 3-5-2013


March 5, 2013

I am Augustus Alzona, a humble immigrant from Asia, a Maryland resident taxpayer for over four decades, a business owner, citizen activist and community organizer from the limousine liberal occupied territory of Montgomery County.  I am also a former, two term member of the county’s Committee on Hate / Violence.

Mr. Chairman, honorable members of the Judiciary Committee, I urge you to vote down these gun control bills - especially for the following two reasons.

1.  They are inherently racist in nature and application. 
2.  They are anti-Catholic, anti-Christian.

No. 1 – They are inherently racist in nature and application.

During the infamous 1992 L.A. (Los Angeles) Riots, after the LAPD (Los Angeles Police Dept.) withdrew from the south central district, barbaric hordes of thugs assaulted and killed innocent civilians, as well as looted and burned down several local minority-owned businesses.  The decent law-abiding working people of South Central were basically abandoned by the police who had withdrawn to protect the more affluent areas of Hollywood, Beverly Hills, etc.

When the well-armed lawless thugs attacked “Koreatown” they were prevented from reaping mayhem and plunder there by my fellow Asian American businessmen wielding so-called assault weapons and other semi-automatic, homeland security devices with high-capacity magazines.

These gun control bills would inhibit, if not outright ban, my fellow law-abiding Asian Americans from possessing those types of homeland security devices, especially those high-capacity magazines, which are needed when facing multiple assailants carrying same.

No. 2 – These violate my human rights as a Catholic Christian.

As pertains to self-defense and weapons, I hereby quote from a recent translation from Latin, of relevant passages from the Justinian Code, a legal pillar of Western Civilization.  (Footnote 1)

“”I. SELF DEFENSE

Roman law was very protective of the individual’s right to defend himself and his property from violence, whether offered by a thief on a darkened highway or a soldier in search of plunder.

A provision attributed to the late fourth century A.D. reads:

We grant to all persons the unrestricted power to defend themselves (liberam resistendi cunctis tribuimus facultatem), so that it is proper to subject anyone, whether a private person or a soldier, who trespasses upon fields at night in search of plunder, or lays by busy roads plotting to assault passers-by, to immediate punishment in accordance with the authority granted to all (permissa cuicumque licentia dignus ilico supplicio subiugetur). Let him suffer the death which he threatened and incur that which he intended (Codex Justinianus (“CJ”) 3.27.1). 

The legislator then explains the rationale for this provision, stating, “For it is better to meet the danger at the time, than to obtain legal redress (vindicare) after one’s death.”

And he concludes:

We therefore permit you to seek your own revenge (ultionem) and we join to this decree those situations which a legal judgment would be too late to remedy (quod serum est punire iudicio).

Thus, let no one shrink from facing (parcat) a soldier, whom it is fitting to challenge with a weapon (telo), just as it is fitting to challenge a thief (A.D. 391).

This provision recognizes not only an individual’s right to self defense, but explicitly permits the private use of a weapon (telum) for the purpose of countering an assailant as well.“”

These bills severely inhibit, as well as subvert my human rights, as a Catholic Christian, to self-defense as codified in Codex Justinianus (Justinian Code) – human rights laws which even predate the U.S. Constitution and the founding of this country.

Please vote down all bills which inhibit my constitutional and civil rights.

Respectfully submitted,

Augustus Alzona
Personal         
info              
redacted   

Footnote 1 - “The Roman Legal Treatment of Self Defense and the Private Possession of Weapons in the Codex Justinianus” by Will Tysse

Monday, November 12, 2012

Lavender versus Cinnamon Counties in Maryland 2012 – on Question 6 (homosexual marriage)


Lavender versus Cinnamon Counties in Maryland 2012 – on Question 6 (homosexual marriage)

Lavender Counties – voted FOR homosexual marriage

Anne Arundel
Baltimore City
Baltimore
Frederick
Howard
Montgomery

Cinnamon Counties – voted AGAINST homosexual marriage

Allegany
Calvert
Caroline
Carroll
Cecil
Charles
Dorchester
Garrett
Harford
Kent
Prince George’s
Queen Anne’s
St. Mary’s
Somerset
Talbot
Washington
Wicomico
Worchester


Detailed election results:
Last Updated 11/12/2012 01:01:01 PM

Question 06

Civil Marriage Protection Act (Ch. 2 of the 2012 Legislative Session)

Referendum Petition

Yes
No
Allegany County
9,654
18,636
Anne Arundel County
122,499
112,907
Baltimore City
126,244
94,666
Baltimore County
178,669
169,517
Calvert County
19,648
23,490
Caroline County
4,606
7,898
Carroll County
36,843
47,618
Cecil County
17,926
22,715
Charles County
32,054
38,725
Dorchester County
5,441
8,780
Frederick County
56,562
54,948
Garrett County
3,357
9,035
Harford County
53,545
67,655
Howard County
85,741
59,692
Kent County
4,582
4,774
Montgomery County
257,460
137,498
Prince George's County
168,086
172,471
Queen Anne's County
10,365
13,290
St. Mary's County
19,762
25,324
Somerset County
3,102
5,976
Talbot County
9,327
10,156
Washington County
21,967
35,236
Wicomico County
15,324
23,731
Worcester County
10,654
14,814
Totals
1,273,418 ( 51.9%)
1,179,552 ( 48.1%)

Friday, October 19, 2012

Alzona presages 2012 Maryland GOP election results in a Gazette Newspapers story

Augustus Alzona presages 2012 Maryland election results for the GOP in a Gazette Newspapers story, by C. Benjamin Ford, quoted below:
...
In Montgomery County, nonaffiliated voters passed registered Republicans for the first time in December 2010. In the latest report, there were 333,118 Democrats, 123,404 Republicans and 133,523 nonaffiliated voters.

Augustus Alzona, who served on the Montgomery County Republican Central Committee from 1998 to 2002 and again from 2006 to 2010, said he was not surprised.

From his observations, voter registration outreach efforts by the Montgomery County GOP initially helped attract new voters, including minorities in the increasingly diverse county, Alzona said.

But then, money raised was sent to help the top of the campaign tickets and less was spent on local retail political efforts, he said.

That was a major reason why the number of nonaffiliated voters eventually passed the number of registered Republicans, he said.

Republican numbers have continued to decline in Montgomery County, while the number of Democrats and nonaffiliated voters grows, he said.

Alzona, who remains a Republican, expressed frustration that as a socially conservative Catholic, he believes too many Republicans are supporting same-sex marriage. This could lead other social conservatives to leave the party and either become independents or find another party to join, he said.

“One of my pet peeves was the focus was solely on fundraising and not on the grass-roots fundamentals of registering voters,” Alzona said.
...

"Number of nonaffiliated voters continues to grow"

http://www.gazette.net/article/20121019/NEWS/710199726/1124/number-of-nonaffiliated-voters-continues-to-grow&template=gazette

Friday, April 27, 2012

MarylandGOP's Diversity Slate - April 2012

The following MarylandGOP's Diversity Slate of candidates has been endorsed for election, at the Maryland Republican Party's 2012 Spring Convention, as Delegates and Alternate Delegates to the Republican National Committee (RNC) Convention to be held in Tampa, Florida, August 2012.

Delegates to the RNC Convention:

CANDICE CLOUGH
MARK CRAWFORD
MICHAEL HARGADON
LARRY HELMINIAK
FAITH LOUDON
TONY O'DONNELL
JAMES RETER
RICK SAFFERY
ALLEN TWIGG
CORROGAN VAUGHN

Alternate Delegates to the RNC Convention:

COLLINS BAILEY
CAROL BOWIS
ADRIAN CITRONI
J. SCOTT DELONG
TOM DE SABLA
TYLER HARWOOD
JESSICA RAMOS
GEORGE OTTO
JERRY WALKER
DARRELL R. WOOD